Talk:FediBlock: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (Since it's just a question about qoto) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
:So I see no reason to take qoto off the list.<br> | :So I see no reason to take qoto off the list.<br> | ||
:--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 07:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC) | :--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 07:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
::The evidence provided was taken completely out of complex, and dishonest, not to mention leaves out very important details. I will address each one and show the photto evidence, which be more than sufficient to remove QOTO from the list presuming this is an evidence-based block list. | |||
::First off the full context of the conversation quoted out of context is seen here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109405618861950255 | |||
::As is obvious from the screen shots above we were not talking about blocking users but servers. We do moderate heavily, and specifically racism, our terms of service are quite clear on that and no racist content can be found on our timeline. see here: https://qoto.org/about/more | |||
::Second as for CSAM/child porn. When asked we had no rules about how to handle it since we never had any. Our rules page can only be updated with a majority vote from the moderators of the instance (which i clearly say as such).. moments after that conversation we had a vote and explicitly added the banning of CSAM material, both WRT defederating from other servers, and within our own community. You can now find that on our ToS page explicitly stated as linked above. | |||
::As for the UFI document, that has no relationship to QOTO of any kind. I am authoring it, but QOTO is not a part of the UFI, so no relevance there. I will point out the clause about nudity also explicitly defines nudity as genitalia and sexual penetration only, not toplessness. Moreover the clause about "Explicit hate based racism" has been removed since "explicit" is too restrictive. | |||
::I find it quitte discrediting of this list to include clear manipulative "evidence" without providing the counter evidence, lets hope this resolves it. I will for now at a minimum add the full context of the conversation into the wiki and replace the existant to see as a test to see if this block list has any intention of being honest and providing the full evidence. | |||
::[[User:JeffreyFreeman|JeffreyFreeman]] ([[User talk:JeffreyFreeman|talk]]) 10:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |