Talk:What are Fediverse projects?: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
: --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET) | : --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET) | ||
:: Thank you Paula, I've started a draft at [[Draft:WordPress]]. I could start a draft for Drupal or any other mainstream content management systems that have plugins available to speak the ActivityPub protocol. [[User:Jon|Jon]] ([[User talk:Jon|talk]]) 00:24, 21 January 2022 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:24, 21 January 2022
List multiple projects under one heading?
Since each heading aims to replace a mainstream platform, it would be better to combine for example Mastodon, Pleroma and Misskey in one section since they all aim to be a Twitter replacement.
--Craftplacer (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2021 (CET)
- I don't know. But isn't the table enough to combine the projects that replace the same service?
CMS plugins
Is there a particular place (or preferred way) to highlight integrations of the AP protocol into content management systems? I know offhand that both WordPress and Drupal have ActivityPub plugins and this could be a good way to inform people that their web site can become Content subscribable to the wider Fediverse.
For instance:
Jon (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2021 (CET)
- Sorry for the late reply. I'd probbably create pages like "What is WordPress?" for each of those.
- --Paula (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET)
- Thank you Paula, I've started a draft at Draft:WordPress. I could start a draft for Drupal or any other mainstream content management systems that have plugins available to speak the ActivityPub protocol. Jon (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2022 (CET)