Talk:FediBlock: Difference between revisions
(→What's the process here exactly?: new section) |
|||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
I'd like to lobby to have qoto.org removed from the list; the reasons given ("no moderation" and "free speech") are just wrong. qoto has moderation, like any reasonable server, and it's not some "free speech" nuthouse. The thing that it doesn't do, and that some people don't like it for, is that it doesn't defederate in most cases (there are exceptions); the rationale for this policy is nicely described here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109319817943835261 | I'd like to lobby to have qoto.org removed from the list; the reasons given ("no moderation" and "free speech") are just wrong. qoto has moderation, like any reasonable server, and it's not some "free speech" nuthouse. The thing that it doesn't do, and that some people don't like it for, is that it doesn't defederate in most cases (there are exceptions); the rationale for this policy is nicely described here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109319817943835261 | ||
There are people who don't like the main mod, think his politics are too centrist, or whatever, but that shouldn't lead to blocking the whole server unless it has some impact on the server's moderation or behavior (which it hasn't). The thread pointed to in the table is pretty much entirely a few people who just don't like the guy and don't like some proposal that he put on github; nothing about actual server moderation or behavior. It even ends with someone saying "oh, I misread this because I thought it said hate speech WAS allowed, but it says that it ISN'T, oops my bad" or other words to that effect. This doesn't seem like a great reason for blocking! | |||
People are citing this list commonly as some authoritative list of nastybad servers; since qoto.org seems to be on it for reasons that aren't actually true, could it be removed? | People are citing this list commonly as some authoritative list of nastybad servers; since qoto.org seems to be on it for reasons that aren't actually true, could it be removed? | ||
Thanks! http://qoto.org/@ceoln | Thanks! http://qoto.org/@ceoln | ||
Revision as of 04:36, 2 December 2022
candidates
| instance | when blocked? | block reason(s) | links ‼️cw‼️ | block count | up/down last checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| niscii.xyz | 18 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| novoa.nagoya | 34 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| hallsofamenti.io | 34 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| glindr.org | 139 | 2022-11-26 | |||
| qoto.org | 86 | 2022-11-26 | |||
| skippers-bin.com | 75 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| nnia.space | 68 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| tastingtraffic.net | 67 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| catgirl.life | 63 | 2022-11-28 | |||
| vuju.com | 26 | 2022-11-28 |
bea.st misspelling?
Should this be bae.st instead?
--IgnisIncendio2 (talk) 08:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
CSV file
I appreciate the way the table is laid out, because it was quite easy to paste into a CSV file that can be imported into GlitchSoc or Ecko Mastodon forks. I was able to import the blocklist that way (it's just... too many to check through, unfortunately). Is this allowed? Should I upload it here? :O --IgnisIncendio2 (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm against sharing a .csv file of the list as people will just import it without checking the instances first themselves.
- --Paula (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
What's the process here exactly?
I'd like to lobby to have qoto.org removed from the list; the reasons given ("no moderation" and "free speech") are just wrong. qoto has moderation, like any reasonable server, and it's not some "free speech" nuthouse. The thing that it doesn't do, and that some people don't like it for, is that it doesn't defederate in most cases (there are exceptions); the rationale for this policy is nicely described here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109319817943835261
There are people who don't like the main mod, think his politics are too centrist, or whatever, but that shouldn't lead to blocking the whole server unless it has some impact on the server's moderation or behavior (which it hasn't). The thread pointed to in the table is pretty much entirely a few people who just don't like the guy and don't like some proposal that he put on github; nothing about actual server moderation or behavior. It even ends with someone saying "oh, I misread this because I thought it said hate speech WAS allowed, but it says that it ISN'T, oops my bad" or other words to that effect. This doesn't seem like a great reason for blocking!
People are citing this list commonly as some authoritative list of nastybad servers; since qoto.org seems to be on it for reasons that aren't actually true, could it be removed?
Thanks! http://qoto.org/@ceoln