Draft:What is not the Fediverse?

Revision as of 15:05, 19 November 2024 by Paula (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Draft}} "The Fediverse is a giant decentralized or "federated" network of social media services owned and moderated by the people, consisting of mostly free software." That's the first sentence in this wiki's {{Internal link |target=Draft:New Fediverse Article |link-name=article about the Fediverse}} and it already makes clear what we consider the vital principles of the network and also, what we don't consider part of the Fediverse, because of not living up to these...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article is a draft!
A lot of info might still be missing and the page might change at any time.

"The Fediverse is a giant decentralized or "federated" network of social media services owned and moderated by the people, consisting of mostly free software."

That's the first sentence in this wiki's article about the Fediverse and it already makes clear what we consider the vital principles of the network and also, what we don't consider part of the Fediverse, because of not living up to these principles.

To recap, the principles are:

  • decentralized/federated
  • owned by the people
  • moderated by the people
  • (mostly) free software

So what we don't consider part of the Fediverse are:

  • centralized plattforms
  • corporate owned servers
  • unmoderated or badly moderated servers (including AI-assisted moderation)
  • proprietary software

Here are some examples:

federated? people owned? moderated well? non-proprietary software?
Bluesky theoretically yes but in fact all users are one one instance that is indirectly communicating with parts of the Fediverse ✖️ ✖️ ✖️
Threads no, one centralized instance with ability to communicate with parts of the Fediverse ✖️ ✖️ ✖️
Flipboard no, one centralized instance with ability to communicate with parts of the Fediverse ✖️ unknown, probably not ✖️
flipboard.social yes, its a Mastodon instance ✖️ unknown, probably not yes, its a Mastodon instance
instances on #FediBlock for bad moderation yes, but blocked by a huge part of the Fediverse yes, probably most of them ✖️ ✔️
instances mirroring content from other platforms no, mirroring is not federation doesn't apply, since there are no people on these instances no, they just mirror badly moderated content from elsewhere most probably are

Many of the reasons for not being considered part of the Fediverse go hand in hand. E.g. Bluesky uses the AT protocol, which is free and allows federation. But Bluesky itself is proprietary software, so there is basically only one central instance owned by the company. And since its owned by the company it is not moderated well. Bluesky claims they have a cool novel approach to moderation which allows communities to moderate for themselves and everybody to choose their own moderation, but what that means is just that they don't bother moderating at all.