Talk:FediBlock
candidates
instance | when blocked? | block reason(s) | links ‼️cw‼️ | block count | up/down last checked |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
niscii.xyz | 18 | 2022-11-28 | |||
novoa.nagoya | 34 | 2022-11-28 | |||
hallsofamenti.io | 34 | 2022-11-28 | |||
glindr.org | 139 | 2022-11-26 | |||
qoto.org | 86 | 2022-11-26 | |||
skippers-bin.com | 75 | 2022-11-28 | |||
nnia.space | 68 | 2022-11-28 | |||
tastingtraffic.net | 67 | 2022-11-28 | |||
catgirl.life | 63 | 2022-11-28 | |||
vuju.com | 26 | 2022-11-28 |
bea.st misspelling?
Should this be bae.st instead?
--IgnisIncendio2 (talk) 08:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
CSV file
I appreciate the way the table is laid out, because it was quite easy to paste into a CSV file that can be imported into GlitchSoc or Ecko Mastodon forks. I was able to import the blocklist that way (it's just... too many to check through, unfortunately). Is this allowed? Should I upload it here? :O --IgnisIncendio2 (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
What's the process here exactly?
I'd like to lobby to have qoto.org removed from the list; the reasons given ("no moderation" and "free speech") are just wrong. qoto has moderation, like any reasonable server, and it's not some "free speech" nuthouse. The thing that it doesn't do, and that some people don't like it for, is that it doesn't defederate in most cases (there are exceptions); the rationale for this policy is nicely described here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109319817943835261
People are citing this list commonly as some authoritative list of nastybad servers; since qoto.org seems to be on it for reasons that aren't actually true, could it be removed?
Thanks! http://qoto.org/@ceoln