Talk:Best practices: Difference between revisions
m (→Good sources) |
Bewildermint (talk | contribs) (→Nitter is dead: new section) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
In German: <br> | In German: <br> | ||
https://www.skalabyrinth.org/queer/BarriereaermerPosten.html | https://www.skalabyrinth.org/queer/BarriereaermerPosten.html | ||
== Nitter is dead == | |||
I am not sure of any alternatives due to this: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376 - is it time to remove this reference? |
Revision as of 03:08, 15 May 2024
What is the meaning of the Twitter-Fedi crosspost paragraph?
What issue is it trying to avoid/portray?
That Fedi users post Twitter handles that get understood as local handles when they copy the text of a tweet? or that it isn't allowed anymore to give credit to the original post that didn't originate from Fedi?
--Craftplacer (talk) 13:59, 27 December 2021 (CET)
I guess it's in the wrong section, probably better to put it in an "other" section.
Very many people find crossposts to be a spammy annoyance at best or very aggravating at worst. The Fediverse is not the place to build a graveyard for Twitter posts. You can help yourself by creating many filters, but posts with just Twitter handles (without the @twitter.com) can't easily be filtered, so they are specially annoying.
--Paula (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2021 (CET)
Inclusion
Although I understand, and adhere to, the preference for "main" instead of "master" for software branches, I don't think the phrase 'or "master" and "slave" for software branches' is convincing because I've never come across "slave" as a branch name. I will try a rewording.
Good sources
In German:
https://www.skalabyrinth.org/queer/BarriereaermerPosten.html
Nitter is dead
I am not sure of any alternatives due to this: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376 - is it time to remove this reference?