Talk:Fediverse projects: Difference between revisions

From Join the Fediverse
mNo edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


: --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET)
: --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET)
:: Thank you Paula, I've started a draft at [[Draft:WordPress]]. I could start a draft for Drupal or any other mainstream content management systems that have plugins available to speak the ActivityPub protocol. [[User:Jon|Jon]] ([[User talk:Jon|talk]]) 00:24, 21 January 2022 (CET)

Revision as of 23:24, 20 January 2022

List multiple projects under one heading?

Since each heading aims to replace a mainstream platform, it would be better to combine for example Mastodon, Pleroma and Misskey in one section since they all aim to be a Twitter replacement.

--Craftplacer (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2021 (CET)

I don't know. But isn't the table enough to combine the projects that replace the same service?
--Paula (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET)

CMS plugins

Is there a particular place (or preferred way) to highlight integrations of the AP protocol into content management systems? I know offhand that both WordPress and Drupal have ActivityPub plugins and this could be a good way to inform people that their web site can become Content subscribable to the wider Fediverse.

For instance:

Jon (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2021 (CET)

Sorry for the late reply. I'd probbably create pages like "What is WordPress?" for each of those.
--Paula (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2022 (CET)
Thank you Paula, I've started a draft at Draft:WordPress. I could start a draft for Drupal or any other mainstream content management systems that have plugins available to speak the ActivityPub protocol. Jon (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2022 (CET)