Talk:Hubzilla: Difference between revisions

From Join the Fediverse
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


While doing so, I could create a separate article about the channel concept which Hubzilla has in common with (streams) as well as several now-defunct projects. This article could be linked to from the corresponding pages. That way, it won't have to be explained separately several times. --[[User:Jupiter Rowland|Jupiter Rowland]] ([[User talk:Jupiter Rowland|talk]]) 15:13, 14 August 2023 (CEST)
While doing so, I could create a separate article about the channel concept which Hubzilla has in common with (streams) as well as several now-defunct projects. This article could be linked to from the corresponding pages. That way, it won't have to be explained separately several times. --[[User:Jupiter Rowland|Jupiter Rowland]] ([[User talk:Jupiter Rowland|talk]]) 15:13, 14 August 2023 (CEST)
::Feel free :) --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 15:17, 14 August 2023 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:17, 14 August 2023

Re-write by someone with practical experience with Hubzilla

Both Hubzilla pages read like they were copy-pasted from official material which, in turn, was written by backend devs who only "speak backend dev". They both don't speak a language which a common user could understand.

Suggestion: Since I've been familiar with Hubzilla for years now, up to and including temporarily running my own hub, I could take some time and re-write them.

While doing so, I could create a separate article about the channel concept which Hubzilla has in common with (streams) as well as several now-defunct projects. This article could be linked to from the corresponding pages. That way, it won't have to be explained separately several times. --Jupiter Rowland (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2023 (CEST)

Feel free :) --Paula (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2023 (CEST)