Talk:Best practices: Difference between revisions

From Join the Fediverse
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:


--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 16:03, 27 December 2021 (CET)
--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 16:03, 27 December 2021 (CET)
== Inclusion ==
Although I understand, and adhere to, the preference for "main" instead of "master" for software branches, I don't think the phrase 'or "master" and "slave" for software branches' is convincing because I've never come across "slave" as a branch name. I will try a rewording.
==Good sources==
In German: <br>
https://www.skalabyrinth.org/queer/BarriereaermerPosten.html
== Nitter is dead ==
I am not sure of any alternatives due to this: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376 - I did find [https://nitter.poast.org/ a public instance that is still running] in this list: https://nitter.poast.org/ and will submit an edit. Otherwise, is it time to remove references to nitter?
:You're right. That can probably be removed. --[[User:Paula|PaulaToThePeople]] ([[User_talk:Paula|talk]]) 13:49, 15 May 2024 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 11:49, 15 May 2024

What is the meaning of the Twitter-Fedi crosspost paragraph?

What issue is it trying to avoid/portray?

That Fedi users post Twitter handles that get understood as local handles when they copy the text of a tweet? or that it isn't allowed anymore to give credit to the original post that didn't originate from Fedi?

--Craftplacer (talk) 13:59, 27 December 2021 (CET)

I guess it's in the wrong section, probably better to put it in an "other" section.

Very many people find crossposts to be a spammy annoyance at best or very aggravating at worst. The Fediverse is not the place to build a graveyard for Twitter posts. You can help yourself by creating many filters, but posts with just Twitter handles (without the @twitter.com) can't easily be filtered, so they are specially annoying.

--Paula (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2021 (CET)

Inclusion

Although I understand, and adhere to, the preference for "main" instead of "master" for software branches, I don't think the phrase 'or "master" and "slave" for software branches' is convincing because I've never come across "slave" as a branch name. I will try a rewording.

Good sources

In German:
https://www.skalabyrinth.org/queer/BarriereaermerPosten.html

Nitter is dead

I am not sure of any alternatives due to this: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376 - I did find a public instance that is still running in this list: https://nitter.poast.org/ and will submit an edit. Otherwise, is it time to remove references to nitter?

You're right. That can probably be removed. --PaulaToThePeople (talk) 13:49, 15 May 2024 (CEST)