Jump to content

What is nomadic identity?/fr: Difference between revisions

Updating to match new version of source page
No edit summary
(Updating to match new version of source page)
Line 134: Line 134:
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Bluesky, the commercial microblogging platform by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, is working on a similar feature. However, Bluesky has only just started decentralising itself, and it is not connected to the Fediverse, save for through bridges and on a very few projects, including Friendica.
Bluesky, the commercial microblogging platform by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, is working on a similar feature. However, Bluesky has only just started decentralising itself, and it is not connected to the Fediverse, save for through bridges and on a very few projects, including Friendica.
</div>
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
=== Compatibility between Hubzilla and (streams) ===
</div>
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Compatibility between the currently two implementations of nomadic identity is highly limited even though (streams) is a descendant of Hubzilla, and its Nomad protocol is a descendant of Hubzilla's Zot protocol.
</div>
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Synchronised clones are only possible within the same server software. It is not possible to create a synchronised clone of a Hubzilla channel on (streams) or vice versa.
</div>
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Using nomadic identity tools to move a channel from Hubzilla to (streams) is possible: The channel has to be manually exported from Hubzilla and then manually imported into a (streams) account. But since Nomad is so much more advanced than Zot, moving a channel from (streams) to Hubzilla is impossible without manipulating the exported channel, and manipulated exported (streams) channels can damage entire Hubzilla hubs upon import, so it is officially declared impossible.
</div>
</div>


6,769

edits