Talk:FediBlock: Difference between revisions

 
(82 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==candidates==
== For alternative misskey.io links ==


{| class="wikitable sortable"
Hi, I just noticed that the link about misskey.io is broken.
!instance
!when blocked?
!block reason(s)
!links ‼️cw‼️
![https://gist.github.com/yetzt/32c754fbe87009f8c161f40541147c70 block count]
!up/down last checked
|-
!niscii.xyz
|
|
|
|18
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!novoa.nagoya
|
|
|
|34
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!hallsofamenti.io
|
|
|
|34
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!glindr.org
|
|
|
|139
|{{yes|2022-11-26}}
|-
!qoto.org
|
|
|
|86
|{{yes|2022-11-26}}
|-
!skippers-bin.com
|
|
|
|75
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!nnia.space
|
|
|
|68
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!tastingtraffic.net
|
|
|
|67
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!catgirl.life
|
|
|
|63
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|-
!vuju.com
|
|
|
|26
|{{yes|2022-11-28}}
|}


== bea.st misspelling? ==
Here are the URLs of the archive sites, so please use them instead.


Should this be bae.st instead? <br>
The first is apparently hidden, but is actually written in the source.
--[[User:IgnisIncendio2|IgnisIncendio2]] ([[User talk:IgnisIncendio2|talk]]) 08:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


:Should be both actually. I'll add bae.st
Hope these help.
:--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 08:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


::No you were right. Bea.st is a completely unrelated site.<br>
:I don't see a link? --[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 10:58, 15 August 2023 (CEST)
::--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 14:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


== CSV file ==
::Sorry, I'm not familiar with Wiki, so it seems that I posted without writing the URLs
::Here are them.
::* https://archive.li/aVtk6
::* https://archive.li/R8Ozg


I appreciate the way the table is laid out, because it was quite easy to paste into a CSV file that can be imported into GlitchSoc or Ecko Mastodon forks. I was able to import the blocklist that way (it's just... too many to check through, unfortunately). Is this allowed? Should I upload it here? :O --[[User:IgnisIncendio2|IgnisIncendio2]] ([[User talk:IgnisIncendio2|talk]]) 04:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
:::I can't see the content of the CWd post of the first link. Is it just me or is that not stored in the archive?
:::--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 10:30, 17 August 2023 (CEST)


:I'm against sharing a .csv file of the list as people will just import it without checking the instances first themselves.<br>
::::The content is hidden in the archive, but is actually written in the source.
:--[[User:Paula|Paula]] ([[User talk:Paula|talk]]) 18:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
::::It is written with the writing "この投稿では、主にLGBT+に言及します。" on the 102nd line.
 
::::--Gou 16:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
== What's the process here exactly? ==
 
I'd like to lobby to have qoto.org removed from the list; the reasons given ("no moderation" and "free speech") are just wrong. qoto has moderation, like any reasonable server, and it's not some "free speech" nuthouse. The thing that it doesn't do, and that some people don't like it for, is that it doesn't defederate in most cases (there are exceptions); the rationale for this policy is nicely described here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109319817943835261
 
There are people who don't like the main mod, think his politics are too centrist, or whatever, but that shouldn't lead to blocking the whole server unless it has some impact on the server's moderation or behavior (which it hasn't). The thread pointed to in the table is pretty much entirely a few people who just don't like the guy and don't like some proposal that he put on github; nothing about actual server moderation or behavior. It even ends with someone saying "oh, I misread this because I thought it said hate speech WAS allowed, but it says that it ISN'T, oops my bad" or other words to that effect. This doesn't seem like a great reason for blocking!
 
People are citing this list commonly as some authoritative list of nastybad servers; since qoto.org seems to be on it for reasons that aren't actually true, could it be removed?
 
Thanks! http://qoto.org/@ceoln
3

edits