Translations:Ecko (discontinued)/1/en: Difference between revisions

From Join the Fediverse
(Importing a new version from external source)
 
(Importing a new version from external source)
Line 2: Line 2:
Ecko is a [[ What is Mastodon? |Mastodon]] fork with many cool features, that Mastodon doesn't have. <br>
Ecko is a [[ What is Mastodon? |Mastodon]] fork with many cool features, that Mastodon doesn't have. <br>
It follows the [https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec/42/ Collective Code Construction Contract] or C4 to e.g. add features that are deemed valuable by the community. <br>
It follows the [https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec/42/ Collective Code Construction Contract] or C4 to e.g. add features that are deemed valuable by the community. <br>
This is a difference from Mastodon, where its author Eugen Rochko decides which features Mastodon should have on his own even against the public opinion.
This is a difference from Mastodon, where its author [[Fedizen:Eugen Rochko|Eugen Rochko]] decides which features Mastodon should have on his own even against the public opinion.

Revision as of 13:04, 9 January 2023

Information about message (contribute)
This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Ecko (discontinued))
Ecko is a [[ Mastodon |Mastodon]] fork with many cool features, that Mastodon doesn't have. <br>
It follows the [https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec/42/ Collective Code Construction Contract] or C4 to e.g. add features that are deemed valuable by the community. <br>
This is a difference from Mastodon, where its author [[Fedizen:Eugen Rochko|Eugen Rochko]] decides which features Mastodon should have on his own even against the public opinion.

Ecko logo
Ecko
Website joinecko.com
Official instance c4.social
List of instances fediverse.observer

Ecko is a Mastodon fork with many cool features, that Mastodon doesn't have.
It follows the Collective Code Construction Contract or C4 to e.g. add features that are deemed valuable by the community.
This is a difference from Mastodon, where its author Eugen Rochko decides which features Mastodon should have on his own even against the public opinion.